Font Sizer

Search for Clients and Projects

Search results for "program delivery contractor":

ProjectClientWhen
Cross-Cutting Evaluation of Business Incentive Programs Ontario Power Authority 2013

Page #1 of 1  

home | our vision | projects | clients | our team | contact
copyright © 2011 research into action, inc.
Follow Research Into Action on Twitter Follow us on Twitter
Become our fan on Facebook
Certified by the Women's Business Enterprise National Council
Certified by the National Women Business Owners Corporation

Project: Cross-Cutting Evaluation of Business Incentive Programs

Ontario Power Authority

In 2011, Research Into Action served on a team led by Nexant that launched a three-year process evaluation of Ontario Power Authority's (OPA) Cross-Cutting business incentive initiatives: saveONenergy Retrofit, Audit Funding, and Existing Building Commissioning. These OPA initiatives are implemented by more than 70 local distribution companies (LDCs or utilities) in the Province of Ontario. We are leading the process evaluation to address OPA's goals of assessing the initiatives’ comprehensiveness, operational efficiency, and implementation consistency across the LDCs. Through this effort, we are investigating the effectiveness of marketing strategies and tactics, motivations for behavior and decision-making processes (including reasons for participation and non-participation and decisions about which measures to install), frequency of and factors affecting the conversion of audits to retrofit projects, the appropriateness of incentive levels, and job impacts. This large and complex evaluation entails secondary research; analyses of participant files; interviews with OPA and LDC staff, third-party implementers, project evaluation contractors, auditors, and commissioning agents; and surveys of retrofit contactors and participants, active nonparticipants, and true nonparticipants of the three initiatives. In addition, we will lead the effort to assess savings attribution, which is critical for assessment of net savings and program cost-effectiveness.